JOANNA R. PEPIN

  • About Me
  • C.V.
  • Publications
  • Press
  • Blog
  • Code
    • ATUS
  • Teaching
  • About Me
  • C.V.
  • Publications
  • Press
  • Blog
  • Code
    • ATUS
  • Teaching

Young Men AND Women Are Less Progressive About Gender Dynamics in Families Than They Used To Be

4/1/2017

4 Comments

 
Yesterday, the New York Times published an op-ed piece by Stephanie Coontz titled “Do Millennial Men Want Stay-at-Home Wives?” In it, Coontz highlights research I co-authored with David Cotter which is featured in a set of reports by the Council on Contemporary Families (CCF). Based on nationally representative survey data of high school seniors (Monitoring the Future), we show that youths’ attitudes about gender in families became more progressive from the mid-1970s until the mid-1990s, after which the trend reversed course. 
Picture

​"Garbage Millennial Men" Is Not the Story

Although the New York Times used a click-bait title for the op-ed, the main story is not that millennial men are becoming more traditional in their gender attitudes at a greater rate than millennial women. A paper included in CCF’s online symposium used data from the General Social Survey to investigate 18-25 year olds’ beliefs about male breadwinner/female homemaker arrangements, which Coontz reviews in her New York Times op-ed. This data showed a slight divergence in young men’s and women’s beliefs about gender in families. Concerns were raised that the sample sizes were small, and then data released this week from the 2016 survey – after Coontz’s piece went to press – show the opposite pattern. Emily Beam provided a nice overview of this discussion. Unfortunately, her explanation is now getting misinterpreted too, such as in this piece in Fortune, declaring “Relax, Millennial Men Don’t Actually Want to Keep Women in the Kitchen.”
​
The take-away from our research of high school seniors’ attitudes is that millennial men and women are mostly in agreement about gender dynamics in families, and they are less progressive than we thought – and less progressive than they were two decades ago. The surprising trend in youths’ attitudes about gender in families is not that young men hold more conventional beliefs than young women, but that both men and women are espousing less egalitarian beliefs than before. Cotter and I describe the trend, presented below, in our response paper in the CCF symposium.
Picture

​Youth are Not Questioning Mothers’ Employment

​The second misinterpretation from our findings is that youth do not support women’s and mothers’ employment. The comment section of the New York Times article shows people rehashing the “mommy wars” debate – do people prefer a stay-at-home mother arrangement or a dual-earner partnership. This is understandable given the New York Times headline and our emphasis on the increasing agreement that the male breadwinner/female homemaker model is best for everyone. However, Monitoring the Future data show a much more complicated story. In fact, results show young men and women increasingly support women’s equality at work and are less likely to believe mothers’ employment harms children. 
Picture
Picture
We argue that these seemingly contradictory attitudes are evidence of beliefs in “egalitarian essentialism” – pairing beliefs that men and women are inherently different with commitment to equal opportunity.
​
If you want to dig deeper into our findings, please check out our working paper, available on SocArxiv.
4 Comments
Jonathan Wiley link
4/14/2017 05:03:11 pm

When I read the NY Times article and then looked at your research, I was curious about the apparent disconnect between the headline and the data you presented. I'm trying to read through all of the striking findings that you've unearthed, but I haven't noticed any theories about the precise timing of the trend reversal. Is the driver a lack of pre-Reagan memories? Super interesting/frustrating results.

Reply
Joanna Pepin
4/18/2017 02:45:13 pm

Thanks for the comment! Yes, the NYTimes headline didn't capture our main findings. Good question about the reversal. Our data is much better at describing trends than explaining why. The timing is consistent with lots of behavioral research showing a stall in the mid-1990s in progress for women but there continues to be debate about the mechanisms.

Reply
Jason link
12/23/2020 10:17:24 am

Thanks for tthis

Reply
John Reyes link
10/17/2022 11:39:19 am

Director onto way trouble do. Expert skin myself kid resource recognize.
Avoid Congress rock almost room. Little consumer food every benefit hand.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture